+258.1%
MTZ vs FTV
+33.2%
+224.9%
-63.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | FTV | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +9.5% | -0.1% | +9.6% | +9.6% |
| 7D | -6.4% | +0.2% | -6.6% | -6.7% |
| 30D | -22.1% | +15.7% | -37.7% | -28.0% |
| 3M | -32.7% | +7.5% | -40.2% | -35.4% |
| 6M | -59.8% | +8.5% | -68.3% | -62.0% |
| YTD | -19.9% | +18.8% | -38.7% | -30.3% |
| 1Y | -11.5% | +28.5% | -40.0% | -28.1% |
| 3Y | +258.1% | +34.0% | +224.1% | +174.7% |
| All | +258.1% | +33.2% | +224.9% | +174.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FTV.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FTV return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FTV return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FTV wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling