+226.9%
MTZ vs FN
+80.0%
+146.9%
-63.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | FN | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -5.2% | -14.2% | +9.1% | +0.5% |
| 7D | -10.6% | -16.0% | +5.4% | -4.9% |
| 30D | -30.4% | -40.1% | +9.7% | -15.6% |
| 3M | -40.4% | -43.9% | +3.5% | -26.7% |
| 6M | -63.7% | -55.6% | -8.0% | -52.0% |
| YTD | -26.9% | -35.7% | +8.8% | -19.5% |
| 1Y | -20.2% | -39.8% | +19.7% | -10.3% |
| All | +226.9% | +80.0% | +146.9% | +124.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FN.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FN return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FN return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FN wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling