+156.5%
MTZ vs BHP
+82.0%
+74.5%
-48.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | BHP | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.1% | -0.3% | +2.5% | +2.3% |
| 7D | -1.6% | -2.9% | +1.3% | -0.1% |
| 30D | -11.1% | +3.4% | -14.5% | -12.9% |
| 3M | -36.7% | +4.1% | -40.8% | -38.3% |
| 6M | -21.9% | +20.6% | -42.5% | -30.0% |
| YTD | +9.1% | +56.1% | -46.9% | -14.9% |
| 1Y | +30.0% | +69.6% | -39.6% | -2.9% |
| All | +156.5% | +82.0% | +74.5% | +71.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BHP.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BHP return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BHP return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BHP wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling