+148.1%
MTZ vs AMC
-79.6%
+227.7%
-50.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | AMC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.1% | +4.3% | -2.2% | +1.9% |
| 7D | -1.6% | +2.3% | -3.9% | -1.7% |
| 30D | -11.1% | -0.7% | -10.3% | -11.1% |
| 3M | -36.7% | +35.2% | -71.9% | -38.3% |
| 6M | -21.9% | +124.6% | -146.5% | -26.7% |
| YTD | +9.1% | +69.9% | -60.8% | +4.0% |
| 1Y | +30.0% | -2.6% | +32.5% | +27.9% |
| All | +148.1% | -79.6% | +227.7% | +162.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside AMC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus AMC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × AMC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded AMC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling