+148.1%
MTZ vs ALM
+2,063.1%
-1,915.0%
-50.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ALM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.1% | -1.5% | +3.6% | +2.2% |
| 7D | -1.6% | -2.6% | +1.0% | -1.4% |
| 30D | -11.1% | +32.0% | -43.1% | -13.0% |
| 3M | -36.7% | -15.0% | -21.7% | -36.9% |
| 6M | -21.9% | -10.1% | -11.8% | -22.7% |
| YTD | +9.1% | +99.4% | -90.3% | +5.6% |
| 1Y | +30.0% | +316.4% | -286.4% | +23.9% |
| All | +148.1% | +2,063.1% | -1,915.0% | +156.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ALM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ALM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ALM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ALM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling