-63.7%
MTZ vs ACM
-20.8%
-42.9%
-63.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | ACM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -5.2% | -2.2% | -3.0% | -5.5% |
| 7D | -10.6% | +5.1% | -15.7% | -10.0% |
| 30D | -30.4% | +11.5% | -41.9% | -29.2% |
| 3M | -40.4% | -10.5% | -30.0% | -41.8% |
| 6M | -63.7% | -20.4% | -43.3% | -64.6% |
| All | -63.7% | -20.8% | -42.9% | -64.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ACM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ACM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ACM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ACM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling