-38.3%
MTZ vs ACGL
+10.6%
-48.9%
-44.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3mo.
| Period | Portfolio | ACGL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -15.4% | +2.7% | -18.1% | -13.1% |
| 7D | -7.4% | +8.0% | -15.4% | -1.6% |
| 30D | -23.6% | +17.3% | -40.9% | -11.4% |
| 3M | -38.3% | +11.2% | -49.5% | -33.4% |
| All | -38.3% | +10.6% | -48.9% | -33.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ACGL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ACGL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ACGL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ACGL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · Available span rolling