+231.9%
MTSI vs LDOS
+39.7%
+192.2%
-44.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LDOS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.5% | +0.5% | +2.9% | +3.4% |
| 7D | +1.4% | -5.4% | +6.8% | +2.2% |
| 30D | +2.1% | +4.9% | -2.8% | +1.3% |
| 3M | -29.7% | +7.2% | -36.9% | -29.9% |
| 6M | +12.5% | -24.2% | +36.8% | +18.8% |
| YTD | +57.0% | -25.8% | +82.8% | +64.9% |
| 1Y | +103.9% | -24.7% | +128.6% | +113.1% |
| All | +231.9% | +39.7% | +192.2% | +194.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LDOS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LDOS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LDOS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LDOS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling