+120.3%
MTSI vs KRMN
+33.3%
+87.0%
-44.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | KRMN | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.5% | -1.3% | +4.8% | +3.8% |
| 7D | +1.4% | -12.3% | +13.7% | +4.3% |
| 30D | +2.1% | -27.5% | +29.6% | +9.5% |
| 3M | -29.7% | -26.5% | -3.2% | -25.3% |
| 6M | +12.5% | -59.6% | +72.1% | +34.8% |
| YTD | +57.0% | -45.4% | +102.4% | +70.2% |
| 1Y | +103.9% | -25.1% | +129.0% | +94.2% |
| All | +120.3% | +33.3% | +87.0% | +56.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside KRMN.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus KRMN return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × KRMN return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded KRMN wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling