+107.9%
MTB vs ZCMD
-100.0%
+207.9%
-28.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZCMD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.4% | -1.7% | +2.1% | +0.4% |
| 7D | -0.4% | -2.0% | +1.6% | -0.4% |
| 30D | -4.6% | -19.8% | +15.2% | -4.6% |
| 3M | +7.4% | -62.1% | +69.5% | +7.4% |
| 6M | +18.7% | -99.5% | +118.2% | +19.4% |
| YTD | +21.1% | -99.7% | +120.8% | +21.9% |
| 1Y | +24.1% | -99.9% | +124.0% | +25.0% |
| All | +107.9% | -100.0% | +207.9% | +101.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZCMD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZCMD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZCMD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZCMD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling