+24.1%
MTB vs RGEN
+39.1%
-15.0%
-17.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | RGEN | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.4% | -0.2% | +0.7% | +0.4% |
| 7D | -0.4% | -2.9% | +2.5% | -0.2% |
| 30D | -4.6% | -0.1% | -4.5% | -4.7% |
| 3M | +7.4% | +25.9% | -18.5% | +4.2% |
| 6M | +18.7% | +35.2% | -16.5% | +13.5% |
| YTD | +21.1% | +0.5% | +20.6% | +18.5% |
| 1Y | +24.1% | +37.0% | -12.9% | +24.0% |
| All | +24.1% | +39.1% | -15.0% | +24.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside RGEN.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus RGEN return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × RGEN return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded RGEN wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling