+107.9%
MTB vs PTEN
-3.4%
+111.2%
-28.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | PTEN | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.4% | -0.2% | +0.7% | +0.5% |
| 7D | -0.4% | +2.8% | -3.2% | -0.9% |
| 30D | -4.6% | +17.6% | -22.2% | -7.4% |
| 3M | +7.4% | +8.2% | -0.7% | +5.5% |
| 6M | +18.7% | +38.1% | -19.4% | +8.9% |
| YTD | +21.1% | +117.3% | -96.2% | -0.9% |
| 1Y | +24.1% | +146.1% | -122.0% | -2.7% |
| All | +107.9% | -3.4% | +111.2% | +90.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PTEN.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PTEN return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PTEN return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PTEN wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling