+107.9%
MTB vs EVRG
+72.0%
+35.9%
-28.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | EVRG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.4% | +0.2% | +0.3% | +0.4% |
| 7D | -0.4% | -0.7% | +0.3% | -0.2% |
| 30D | -4.6% | 0.0% | -4.6% | -4.6% |
| 3M | +7.4% | -1.0% | +8.4% | +7.7% |
| 6M | +18.7% | +1.0% | +17.7% | +18.0% |
| YTD | +21.1% | +15.1% | +6.0% | +14.2% |
| 1Y | +24.1% | +17.6% | +6.5% | +15.5% |
| All | +107.9% | +72.0% | +35.9% | +55.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EVRG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EVRG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EVRG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EVRG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling