+21.7%
MTB vs EPAM
-11.8%
+33.5%
-17.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | EPAM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.3% | -1.6% | +3.9% | +2.4% |
| 7D | -0.8% | +9.1% | -9.8% | -1.2% |
| 30D | +2.4% | +38.5% | -36.1% | -0.1% |
| 3M | -10.5% | +61.0% | -71.5% | -13.8% |
| 6M | +6.4% | +58.0% | -51.6% | +2.0% |
| YTD | +12.8% | -23.5% | +36.3% | +13.6% |
| All | +21.7% | -11.8% | +33.5% | +12.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EPAM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EPAM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EPAM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EPAM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling