+103.2%
MTB vs DOC
+43.5%
+59.7%
-28.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | DOC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.2% | +3.1% | -2.0% | +0.2% |
| 7D | +2.0% | +8.7% | -6.7% | -0.6% |
| 30D | +2.9% | +7.6% | -4.7% | +0.6% |
| 3M | -10.7% | -5.3% | -5.4% | -9.3% |
| 6M | +6.3% | +27.6% | -21.3% | -2.3% |
| YTD | +13.8% | +32.4% | -18.6% | +2.2% |
| 1Y | +27.7% | +22.9% | +4.9% | +18.1% |
| All | +103.2% | +43.5% | +59.7% | +67.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside DOC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus DOC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × DOC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded DOC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling