+96.9%
MTB vs ARWR
+105.6%
-8.6%
-28.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ARWR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.9% | +1.2% | -2.1% | -1.0% |
| 7D | -1.3% | -2.9% | +1.6% | -1.1% |
| 30D | +0.5% | -5.4% | +5.9% | +1.0% |
| 3M | -12.4% | -32.2% | +19.9% | -9.1% |
| 6M | +1.5% | -26.5% | +28.0% | +3.9% |
| YTD | +10.3% | -12.4% | +22.7% | +10.3% |
| 1Y | +22.2% | +46.9% | -24.7% | +14.8% |
| 3Y | +96.9% | +116.0% | -19.0% | +63.8% |
| All | +96.9% | +105.6% | -8.6% | +63.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ARWR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ARWR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ARWR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ARWR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling