-99.2%
MSTZ vs RNG
+146.1%
-245.3%
-99.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | RNG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.6% | -3.9% | +6.5% | +0.1% |
| 7D | -29.7% | +5.8% | -35.5% | -25.9% |
| 30D | -65.3% | +19.6% | -84.9% | -59.9% |
| 3M | -57.3% | +67.0% | -124.4% | -37.7% |
| 6M | -61.6% | +88.4% | -150.0% | -36.0% |
| YTD | -78.3% | +155.5% | -233.8% | -46.9% |
| 1Y | -30.2% | +141.7% | -171.9% | +68.6% |
| All | -99.2% | +146.1% | -245.3% | -96.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside RNG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus RNG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × RNG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded RNG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling