-99.2%
MSTZ vs NVDX
+92.6%
-191.9%
-99.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | NVDX | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.6% | +1.4% | +1.2% | +3.6% |
| 7D | -29.7% | +11.6% | -41.3% | -22.7% |
| 30D | -65.3% | +7.5% | -72.8% | -61.1% |
| 3M | -57.3% | +2.1% | -59.4% | -51.4% |
| 6M | -61.6% | +35.5% | -97.2% | -42.1% |
| YTD | -78.3% | +24.1% | -102.4% | -63.8% |
| 1Y | -30.2% | +33.0% | -63.2% | +29.9% |
| All | -99.2% | +92.6% | -191.9% | -96.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NVDX.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NVDX return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NVDX return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NVDX wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling