-99.2%
MSTZ vs KIM
+9.3%
-108.6%
-99.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | KIM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.6% | -0.2% | +2.8% | +2.4% |
| 7D | -29.7% | +0.4% | -30.1% | -29.8% |
| 30D | -65.3% | -4.0% | -61.3% | -67.0% |
| 3M | -57.3% | +0.5% | -57.9% | -57.6% |
| 6M | -61.6% | +3.6% | -65.2% | -59.7% |
| YTD | -78.3% | +20.4% | -98.7% | -71.8% |
| 1Y | -30.2% | +9.7% | -39.9% | -21.3% |
| All | -99.2% | +9.3% | -108.6% | -98.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside KIM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus KIM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × KIM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded KIM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling