-99.2%
MSTZ vs INVH
-15.2%
-84.1%
-99.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | INVH | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.6% | -0.2% | +2.8% | +2.6% |
| 7D | -29.7% | -2.9% | -26.8% | -30.5% |
| 30D | -65.3% | -6.9% | -58.4% | -66.1% |
| 3M | -57.3% | -2.7% | -54.6% | -58.0% |
| 6M | -61.6% | +8.2% | -69.8% | -59.4% |
| YTD | -78.3% | +4.5% | -82.7% | -77.5% |
| 1Y | -30.2% | -2.3% | -27.9% | -34.7% |
| All | -99.2% | -15.2% | -84.1% | -99.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside INVH.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus INVH return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × INVH return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded INVH wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling