-99.2%
MSTZ vs BNS
+93.2%
-192.5%
-99.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | BNS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.6% | -1.2% | +3.8% | 0.0% |
| 7D | -29.7% | +1.5% | -31.3% | -26.1% |
| 30D | -65.3% | +6.0% | -71.2% | -61.0% |
| 3M | -57.3% | +16.3% | -73.7% | -38.3% |
| 6M | -61.6% | +28.8% | -90.4% | -23.4% |
| YTD | -78.3% | +30.0% | -108.2% | -52.7% |
| 1Y | -30.2% | +50.7% | -80.9% | +140.4% |
| All | -99.2% | +93.2% | -192.5% | -92.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BNS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BNS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BNS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BNS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling