-99.2%
MSTZ vs BBIO
+182.8%
-281.9%
-99.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | BBIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +8.2% | -0.1% | +8.3% | +8.1% |
| 7D | -25.4% | -2.4% | -23.0% | -26.6% |
| 30D | -60.9% | -11.5% | -49.4% | -63.6% |
| 3M | -54.2% | +11.0% | -65.1% | -50.7% |
| 6M | -65.0% | +14.4% | -79.4% | -61.1% |
| YTD | -76.5% | -2.3% | -74.2% | -74.2% |
| 1Y | -23.4% | +37.7% | -61.1% | +2.7% |
| All | -99.2% | +182.8% | -281.9% | -98.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BBIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BBIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BBIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BBIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling