-65.1%
MSTZ vs BBIO
+26.8%
-91.9%
-91.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | BBIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -9.6% | +5.2% | -14.8% | -6.8% |
| 7D | +0.7% | +10.0% | -9.2% | +5.9% |
| 30D | +16.6% | +17.8% | -1.2% | +27.9% |
| 3M | -74.7% | -5.1% | -69.6% | -75.6% |
| 6M | -43.9% | +12.9% | -56.8% | -38.0% |
| YTD | -84.0% | +1.8% | -85.9% | -79.5% |
| 1Y | -65.1% | +26.9% | -92.0% | -49.9% |
| All | -65.1% | +26.8% | -91.9% | -49.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BBIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BBIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BBIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BBIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling