-85.6%
MSTU vs LCID
-87.6%
+2.0%
-99.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | LCID | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.2% | +1.7% | -4.9% | -4.0% |
| 7D | +21.3% | -6.6% | +27.9% | +24.9% |
| 30D | +90.8% | -30.1% | +121.0% | +124.9% |
| 3M | -6.8% | -17.6% | +10.8% | -8.8% |
| 6M | -39.8% | -54.4% | +14.6% | -17.6% |
| YTD | -55.7% | -55.7% | 0.0% | -36.2% |
| 1Y | -92.7% | -71.0% | -21.6% | -86.7% |
| All | -85.6% | -87.6% | +2.0% | -46.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LCID.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LCID return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LCID return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LCID wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling