+308.9%
MSTR vs GLDM
+128.8%
+180.1%
-82.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.4% | -0.9% | -0.5% | -0.8% |
| 7D | +12.2% | -0.5% | +12.7% | +12.8% |
| 30D | +45.2% | +4.4% | +40.8% | +42.7% |
| 3M | +10.4% | -1.1% | +11.4% | +11.6% |
| 6M | -2.5% | -13.7% | +11.2% | +4.2% |
| YTD | -6.0% | +2.8% | -8.8% | -6.9% |
| 1Y | -56.4% | +24.8% | -81.3% | -60.9% |
| All | +308.9% | +128.8% | +180.1% | +171.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling