+102.8%
MSI vs NIO
-90.7%
+193.5%
-27.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.9% | -1.6% | +0.7% | -0.8% |
| 7D | -3.7% | -13.0% | +9.4% | -3.0% |
| 30D | +6.8% | -18.3% | +25.1% | +7.9% |
| 3M | +14.3% | -33.2% | +47.5% | +16.6% |
| 6M | -1.6% | -21.5% | +19.9% | -0.7% |
| YTD | +22.8% | -25.5% | +48.3% | +24.1% |
| 1Y | -1.1% | -38.0% | +36.9% | +0.6% |
| 3Y | +70.5% | -65.5% | +135.9% | +77.2% |
| All | +102.8% | -90.7% | +193.5% | +122.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling