+102.8%
MSI vs LSCC
+82.7%
+20.1%
-27.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | LSCC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.9% | +2.0% | -2.9% | -1.1% |
| 7D | -3.7% | +1.3% | -5.0% | -3.8% |
| 30D | +6.8% | -9.7% | +16.5% | +7.9% |
| 3M | +14.3% | -23.7% | +38.0% | +16.9% |
| 6M | -1.6% | +26.5% | -28.1% | -6.2% |
| YTD | +22.8% | +57.5% | -34.7% | +12.9% |
| 1Y | -1.1% | +75.7% | -76.8% | -10.9% |
| 3Y | +70.5% | +19.5% | +51.0% | +59.8% |
| All | +102.8% | +82.7% | +20.1% | +54.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LSCC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LSCC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LSCC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LSCC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling