+102.8%
MSI vs HTZ
-85.9%
+188.7%
-27.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | HTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.9% | +1.3% | -2.2% | -0.9% |
| 7D | -3.7% | +7.5% | -11.2% | -4.0% |
| 30D | +6.8% | +47.4% | -40.6% | +5.0% |
| 3M | +14.3% | -54.9% | +69.2% | +16.2% |
| 6M | -1.6% | -47.0% | +45.4% | -0.9% |
| YTD | +22.8% | -55.3% | +78.0% | +24.3% |
| 1Y | -1.1% | -57.6% | +56.5% | -0.1% |
| 3Y | +70.5% | -86.6% | +157.1% | +89.5% |
| All | +102.8% | -85.9% | +188.7% | +122.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling