+30.2%
MSFU vs LDOS
+39.7%
-9.5%
-62.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LDOS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.2% | +0.5% | -4.7% | -4.3% |
| 7D | -5.7% | -5.4% | -0.3% | -4.3% |
| 30D | +4.2% | +4.9% | -0.7% | +2.9% |
| 3M | +27.9% | +7.2% | +20.7% | +24.6% |
| 6M | +37.1% | -24.2% | +61.4% | +44.7% |
| YTD | -7.4% | -25.8% | +18.4% | -1.8% |
| 1Y | -19.6% | -24.7% | +5.1% | -15.1% |
| All | +30.2% | +39.7% | -9.5% | +25.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LDOS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LDOS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LDOS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LDOS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling