+76.3%
MSFU vs CMS
+14.6%
+61.7%
-62.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | CMS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.2% | -0.2% | -4.0% | -4.2% |
| 7D | -5.7% | +0.4% | -6.1% | -5.7% |
| 30D | +4.2% | -3.6% | +7.8% | +4.1% |
| 3M | +27.9% | -1.9% | +29.8% | +27.5% |
| 6M | +37.1% | -11.0% | +48.1% | +37.9% |
| YTD | -7.4% | +0.2% | -7.6% | -8.7% |
| 1Y | -19.6% | -1.3% | -18.3% | -20.5% |
| 3Y | +33.2% | +35.9% | -2.7% | +16.3% |
| All | +76.3% | +14.6% | +61.7% | +82.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside CMS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus CMS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × CMS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded CMS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling