+46.2%
MSFT vs UNH
-19.8%
+66.0%
-34.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | UNH | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.2% | +0.6% | -0.4% | +0.2% |
| 7D | -1.3% | +3.4% | -4.6% | -1.3% |
| 30D | -1.8% | +3.0% | -4.8% | -1.9% |
| 3M | +5.6% | +2.7% | +2.9% | +5.6% |
| 6M | +29.8% | +2.8% | +27.0% | +29.8% |
| YTD | +9.0% | +25.9% | -16.9% | +8.4% |
| 1Y | +4.9% | +25.8% | -20.9% | +4.4% |
| 3Y | +46.2% | -20.0% | +66.2% | +49.4% |
| All | +46.2% | -19.8% | +66.0% | +49.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UNH.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UNH return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UNH return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UNH wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling