+48.9%
MSFT vs UMC
+262.0%
-213.1%
-34.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.5% | +4.0% | -4.5% | -0.9% |
| 7D | -1.0% | +13.6% | -14.7% | -2.4% |
| 30D | -2.7% | +20.8% | -23.4% | -4.7% |
| 3M | +22.1% | +16.1% | +6.0% | +17.0% |
| 6M | +20.6% | +137.3% | -116.7% | +1.8% |
| YTD | +2.3% | +193.8% | -191.5% | -18.0% |
| 1Y | -0.5% | +236.1% | -236.6% | -22.9% |
| All | +48.9% | +262.0% | -213.1% | +9.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling