+30.4%
MSFT vs UMAC
+182.0%
-151.6%
-34.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.2% | -4.6% | +4.8% | +0.3% |
| 7D | -1.3% | -5.2% | +3.9% | -1.1% |
| 30D | -1.8% | -36.4% | +34.5% | -0.7% |
| 3M | +5.6% | -58.6% | +64.2% | +7.8% |
| 6M | +29.8% | -24.6% | +54.5% | +29.8% |
| YTD | +9.0% | -11.5% | +20.5% | +8.2% |
| 1Y | +4.9% | +16.9% | -11.9% | +3.6% |
| All | +30.4% | +182.0% | -151.6% | +26.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling