+22.9%
MSFT vs RBRK
+51.5%
-28.6%
-23.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | RBRK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.6% | -2.5% | +3.2% | +1.2% |
| 7D | -0.8% | -7.5% | +6.7% | +0.7% |
| 30D | +0.8% | -10.4% | +11.3% | +2.1% |
| 3M | +27.2% | +21.3% | +5.9% | +16.8% |
| 6M | +22.9% | +50.6% | -27.7% | +3.5% |
| All | +22.9% | +51.5% | -28.6% | +3.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside RBRK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus RBRK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × RBRK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded RBRK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling