+23.8%
MSFT vs PAYC
+78.8%
-55.0%
-23.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | PAYC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.0% | -3.7% | +1.6% | -1.2% |
| 7D | -2.7% | -2.9% | +0.2% | -2.0% |
| 30D | +2.7% | +32.8% | -30.0% | -4.0% |
| 3M | +17.0% | +69.3% | -52.3% | -0.9% |
| 6M | +23.8% | +74.0% | -50.2% | +2.7% |
| All | +23.8% | +78.8% | -55.0% | +2.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PAYC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PAYC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PAYC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PAYC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling