+53.3%
MSFT vs PATH
-3.6%
+56.9%
-34.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | PATH | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.0% | -16.6% | +14.6% | +0.5% |
| 7D | -2.7% | -16.3% | +13.6% | -0.3% |
| 30D | +2.7% | +9.9% | -7.2% | +0.8% |
| 3M | +17.0% | +30.2% | -13.2% | +11.5% |
| 6M | +23.8% | +37.2% | -13.4% | +16.7% |
| YTD | +4.0% | -7.3% | +11.3% | +2.6% |
| 1Y | -0.8% | +40.0% | -40.8% | -8.7% |
| All | +53.3% | -3.6% | +56.9% | +43.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PATH.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PATH return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PATH return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PATH wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling