+58.6%
MSFT vs NVD
-99.2%
+157.8%
-34.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | NVD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.0% | -1.4% | -0.7% | -2.2% |
| 7D | -2.7% | -11.1% | +8.4% | -4.0% |
| 30D | +2.7% | -13.3% | +16.0% | +1.3% |
| 3M | +17.0% | -19.8% | +36.8% | +15.1% |
| 6M | +23.8% | -48.8% | +72.6% | +16.4% |
| YTD | +4.0% | -49.7% | +53.6% | -1.8% |
| 1Y | -0.8% | -61.4% | +60.5% | -8.3% |
| 3Y | +55.6% | -99.1% | +154.7% | +0.5% |
| All | +58.6% | -99.2% | +157.8% | +0.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NVD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NVD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NVD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NVD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling