+28.7%
MSFT vs NIO
-41.8%
+70.5%
-23.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.0% | +5.9% | -6.9% | -2.0% |
| 7D | +1.7% | +5.6% | -3.9% | +0.7% |
| 30D | +0.2% | -4.2% | +4.4% | +0.6% |
| 3M | +6.4% | -26.3% | +32.7% | +10.4% |
| 6M | +28.7% | -42.5% | +71.2% | +34.7% |
| All | +28.7% | -41.8% | +70.5% | +34.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling