+46.2%
MSFT vs MCHP
-13.2%
+59.4%
-34.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | MCHP | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.2% | -0.6% | +0.8% | +0.3% |
| 7D | -1.3% | +5.7% | -7.0% | -2.0% |
| 30D | -1.8% | -13.4% | +11.6% | -0.2% |
| 3M | +5.6% | -20.1% | +25.8% | +8.3% |
| 6M | +29.8% | -35.5% | +65.3% | +35.5% |
| YTD | +9.0% | -1.6% | +10.6% | +5.1% |
| 1Y | +4.9% | +15.5% | -10.5% | -2.1% |
| 3Y | +46.2% | -13.2% | +59.4% | +39.1% |
| All | +46.2% | -13.2% | +59.4% | +39.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MCHP.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MCHP return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MCHP return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MCHP wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling