+46.2%
MSFT vs LII
-8.2%
+54.4%
-34.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LII | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.2% | +1.1% | -1.0% | +0.1% |
| 7D | -1.3% | +2.9% | -4.2% | -1.5% |
| 30D | -1.8% | +0.9% | -2.7% | -2.1% |
| 3M | +5.6% | -15.5% | +21.2% | +7.2% |
| 6M | +29.8% | -30.2% | +60.0% | +33.3% |
| YTD | +9.0% | -26.8% | +35.9% | +9.9% |
| 1Y | +4.9% | -25.3% | +30.2% | +5.3% |
| 3Y | +46.2% | -7.8% | +54.0% | +47.1% |
| All | +46.2% | -8.2% | +54.4% | +47.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LII.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LII return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LII return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LII wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling