+53.0%
MSFT vs GTLB
-3.2%
+56.2%
-34.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | GTLB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.0% | +1.1% | -3.1% | -2.2% |
| 7D | -2.7% | +11.1% | -13.7% | -4.7% |
| 30D | +2.7% | +37.8% | -35.1% | -3.5% |
| 3M | +17.0% | +61.6% | -44.6% | +6.4% |
| 6M | +23.8% | +98.9% | -75.1% | +8.0% |
| YTD | +4.0% | +32.8% | -28.8% | -3.8% |
| 1Y | -0.8% | +14.7% | -15.5% | -6.8% |
| All | +53.0% | -3.2% | +56.2% | +47.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GTLB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GTLB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GTLB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GTLB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling