+53.3%
MSFT vs GD
+68.4%
-15.0%
-34.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | GD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.0% | -1.8% | -0.3% | -1.7% |
| 7D | -2.7% | -5.3% | +2.6% | -1.7% |
| 30D | +2.7% | -6.4% | +9.1% | +4.0% |
| 3M | +17.0% | +5.7% | +11.3% | +15.7% |
| 6M | +23.8% | -0.9% | +24.8% | +24.3% |
| YTD | +4.0% | +8.2% | -4.2% | +2.2% |
| 1Y | -0.8% | +13.4% | -14.2% | -3.7% |
| All | +53.3% | +68.4% | -15.0% | +34.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling