+52.3%
MSFT vs ES
+46.3%
+6.0%
-34.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ES | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.0% | -2.9% | +1.9% | -1.0% |
| 7D | +1.7% | +1.9% | -0.2% | +1.7% |
| 30D | +0.2% | +7.1% | -6.9% | +0.3% |
| 3M | +6.4% | -1.9% | +8.3% | +6.4% |
| 6M | +28.7% | +4.4% | +24.3% | +28.7% |
| YTD | +10.4% | +7.3% | +3.1% | +10.3% |
| 1Y | +7.6% | +2.1% | +5.5% | +7.6% |
| 3Y | +52.3% | +41.8% | +10.5% | +51.6% |
| All | +52.3% | +46.3% | +6.0% | +51.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ES.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ES return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ES return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ES wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling