+73.5%
MSFT vs EPAM
-81.9%
+155.3%
-37.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | EPAM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.0% | -2.4% | +0.3% | -1.6% |
| 7D | -2.7% | +2.0% | -4.6% | -3.0% |
| 30D | +2.7% | +6.5% | -3.8% | +1.2% |
| 3M | +17.0% | +19.9% | -3.0% | +12.4% |
| 6M | +23.8% | -16.9% | +40.8% | +26.4% |
| YTD | +4.0% | -42.9% | +46.9% | +12.5% |
| 1Y | -0.8% | -30.4% | +29.6% | +3.4% |
| 3Y | +55.6% | -54.7% | +110.3% | +69.3% |
| All | +73.5% | -81.9% | +155.3% | +114.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EPAM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EPAM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EPAM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EPAM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling