+9.0%
MSFT vs EPAM
-15.2%
+24.2%
-31.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | EPAM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +6.7% | -0.6% | +7.3% | +6.8% |
| 7D | +4.7% | +0.8% | +3.8% | +4.5% |
| 30D | +5.8% | +24.9% | -19.1% | +2.3% |
| 3M | +13.0% | +22.6% | -9.6% | +9.2% |
| 6M | +34.9% | +24.2% | +10.7% | +28.3% |
| YTD | +15.7% | -33.0% | +48.6% | +21.5% |
| 1Y | +9.0% | -13.3% | +22.3% | +18.7% |
| All | +9.0% | -15.2% | +24.2% | +18.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EPAM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EPAM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EPAM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EPAM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling