+46.0%
MSFT vs EOG
+40.8%
+5.2%
-34.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | EOG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.4% | +1.2% | -0.8% | +0.3% |
| 7D | -2.4% | +7.4% | -9.8% | -2.5% |
| 30D | -3.8% | +2.3% | -6.0% | -3.8% |
| 3M | +6.4% | +9.5% | -3.0% | +6.2% |
| 6M | +28.8% | +17.7% | +11.1% | +27.8% |
| YTD | +8.8% | +52.9% | -44.1% | +5.0% |
| 1Y | +3.2% | +47.7% | -44.5% | -0.1% |
| All | +46.0% | +40.8% | +5.2% | +42.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EOG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EOG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EOG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EOG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling