+45.4%
MSFT vs CMS
+37.7%
+7.7%
-34.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | CMS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.3% | -0.2% | -2.0% | -2.3% |
| 7D | -6.2% | -1.1% | -5.1% | -6.5% |
| 30D | -3.7% | +6.6% | -10.3% | -2.4% |
| 3M | +3.6% | +0.8% | +2.8% | +3.8% |
| 6M | +26.8% | -3.3% | +30.1% | +26.3% |
| YTD | +8.4% | +2.7% | +5.7% | +8.7% |
| 1Y | +3.3% | -4.0% | +7.3% | +2.9% |
| All | +45.4% | +37.7% | +7.7% | +51.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside CMS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus CMS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × CMS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded CMS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling