+52.3%
MSFT vs ALHC
+21.9%
+30.4%
-34.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ALHC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.0% | -2.9% | +1.9% | -1.0% |
| 7D | +1.7% | +1.0% | +0.7% | +1.7% |
| 30D | +0.2% | -14.2% | +14.3% | +0.1% |
| 3M | +6.4% | -45.1% | +51.5% | +6.0% |
| 6M | +28.7% | -59.5% | +88.2% | +28.4% |
| YTD | +10.4% | -62.8% | +73.2% | +10.0% |
| 1Y | +7.6% | -55.5% | +63.1% | +6.9% |
| 3Y | +52.3% | +25.7% | +26.6% | +39.9% |
| All | +52.3% | +21.9% | +30.4% | +39.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ALHC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ALHC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ALHC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ALHC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling