+181.3%
MS vs PLD
+21.6%
+159.7%
-29.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | PLD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.3% | -0.7% | +1.0% | +0.6% |
| 7D | +1.4% | -2.4% | +3.8% | +2.5% |
| 30D | -0.3% | -2.4% | +2.2% | +0.9% |
| 3M | +0.3% | -3.8% | +4.1% | +1.6% |
| 6M | +31.3% | 0.0% | +31.3% | +30.3% |
| YTD | +24.7% | +9.2% | +15.4% | +18.1% |
| 1Y | +47.9% | +25.9% | +22.0% | +29.9% |
| All | +181.3% | +21.6% | +159.7% | +137.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PLD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PLD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PLD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PLD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling