+181.3%
MS vs NSC
+70.9%
+110.4%
-29.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NSC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.3% | +0.5% | -0.2% | 0.0% |
| 7D | +1.4% | -5.5% | +6.9% | +3.9% |
| 30D | -0.3% | -3.2% | +3.0% | +1.1% |
| 3M | +0.3% | +7.7% | -7.4% | -3.6% |
| 6M | +31.3% | +4.5% | +26.8% | +27.6% |
| YTD | +24.7% | +15.6% | +9.1% | +14.7% |
| 1Y | +47.9% | +19.8% | +28.1% | +33.4% |
| All | +181.3% | +70.9% | +110.4% | +105.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NSC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NSC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NSC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NSC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling